Remarque in fairy tale and non-fairy tale text: the problem of speech genre
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2024-7-2-10-25
Abstract
The article raises the problem of the speech-genre status of remarks, by which the narrator accompanies his or her narration. The question of the boundaries of these elements and their relations with the folklore text (fairy tale and non-fairy tale prose), on the basis of which they arise and exist, is investigated. The principal differences between commentary in a fairy tale and in a mythological story and the reasons for these differences are revealed. It is established that the key parameter distinguishing the text of folktale narrative and commentary is the image of the author, as the change of the status of the subject of speech changes the genre. It is also important that each type of subject is correlated with a certain chronotope corresponding to it as a constitutive feature of the subject of speech.
The problem of the relationship of the narrator’s remarks with the narrative text is discussed using the methodology of speech genre theory. It is proposed to consider the narrator’s commentary as an element (microgenre) of the macro-genre “interview/conversation”, breaking through into the folklore text (secondary genre). The speech deictic mode inherent to colloquial speech and, accordingly, to the macrogenre “conversation” manifests itself in the narrator’s remarks, which immediately marks the speaker’s “exit” from the fairy-tale text into a real communicative situation, whereas in the case of mythological stories it is imperceptible due to the similarity of the modality and deixis of these texts with the speech substratum.
About the Author
V. A. ChervanevaRussian Federation
Victoria A. Chervaneva, Cand. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor
Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, Russia, 125047
References
1. Adon’eva, S.B. (2004), Pragmatika fol’klora [The pragmatics of folklore], SPbGU, Amfora, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
2. Arutiunova, N.D. (1992), “Genres of communication”, in Bulygina, T.V., ed., Chelovecheskii faktor v yazyke: Kommunikatsiia, modal’nost’, deiksis [Human factor in language: Communication, modality, deixis], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 52–56.
3. Bakhtin, M.M. (1996), “The problem of speech genres”, in Bakhtin, M.M., Sobranie sochinenii: V 5 t. T. 5: Raboty 1940 – nachala 1960-kh gg. [collected works, 5 vols., vol. 5: Works of the 1940s – early 1960s], Yazyki russkoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia, pp. 159–206.
4. Balashova, L.V. and Dement’ev, V.V. (2022), Russkie rechevye zhanry [Russian speech genres], Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, Moscow, Russia.
5. Borisova, I.N. (2009), Russkii razgovornyi dialog: struktura i dinamika [Russian colloquial dialogue: structure and dynamics], Librokom, Moscow, Russia.
6. Chervaneva, V.A. (2019), “Deixis of oral mythological narratives: What are first person forms talking about?”, Shagi/Steps, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 36–52.
7. Chervaneva, V.A. (2020), “Folk text in dialogic mode: On the status of the language of folklore”, Folklore: Structure, Typology, Semiotics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 72–87.
8. Chervaneva, V.A. (2023), “‘You don’t belong here’: some notes on the deixis of oral mythological stories”, Philology and culture, no. 1, pp. 161–170.
9. Chistov, K.V. (2005), Fol’klor. Tekst. Traditsiia [Folklore. Text. Tradition], OGI, Moscow, Russia.
10. Dement’ev, V.V. (2010), Teoriya rechevykh zhanrov [Theory of speech genres], Znak, Moscow, Russia.
11. Dement’ev, V.V. (2015), “Theory of speech genres and actual processes of modern speech”, Voprosy yazykoznaniya, no. 6, pp. 78–107.
12. Fedosyuk, M.Yu. (1997), “Unresolved questions of the theory of speech genres”, Voprosy yazykoznaniya, no. 5, pp. 102–120.
13. Gerasimova, N.M. (1995), “The figure of mediation in a Russian fairy tale”, in Albedil, M.F., ed., Kunstkamera: Etnograficheskie tetradi [Kunstkamera: Ethnographic notebooks], iss. 8–9, Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 241–250.
14. Gerasimova, N.M. (1997), “Northern Russian fairy tale as a speech genre”, in Adon’eva, S.B., Gerasimova, N.M., Kastrov, A.Yu., Skrelin, P.A. and Tananaiko, S.O., comps., Byulleten’ Foneticheskogo fonda. Prilozhenie № 6: Skazki Russkogo Severa [Bulletin of the Phonetic Fund. Appl. 6: Tales of the Russian North], Rurskii universitet, Bochum, Germany, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 7–27.
15. Gerasimova, N.M. (2012), Pragmatika teksta. Fol’klor. Literatura. Kul’tura [Pragmatics of the Text. Folklore. Literature. Culture], RIII, SPbGU, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
16. Levkievskaia, E.E. (2006), “Pragmatics of the mythological text”, in Tolstaya, S.M., ed., Slavyanskii i balkanskii fol’klor, Vyp. 10: Semantika i pragmatika teksta [Slavic and Balkan folklore, iss. 10: Semantics and pragmatics of the text], Indrik, Moscow, Russia, pp. 150–214.
17. Levkievskaya, E.E. (2008), “Bylichka as a speech genre”, in Arkhipova*, A.S., Gister, M.A. and Koz’min, A.V., eds., Kirpichiki: fol’kloristika i kul’turnaya antropologiya segodnya: Sbornik statei v chest’ 65-letiya S.Yu. Neklyudova i 40-letiya ego nauchnoi deyatel’nosti [Bricks: folkloristics and cultural anthropology today. Digest of articles in honor of the 65th anniversary of S.Yu. Neklyudov and the 40th anniversary of his scientific activity], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 341–363.
18. Lyons, J. (1977), Semantics, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. Migunova, E.A. (2002), “On the question of the function of a mythological story”, in Bobrov, A.G., Danilova, I.F., Madlevskaya, E.L. and Khvorost’yanova, E.V., eds., Traditsionnye modeli v fol’klore, literature, iskusstve: V chest’ Natalii Mikhailovny Gerasimovoi [Traditional models in folklore, literature, art: In honor of Natalia Mikhailovna Gerasimova], Evropeiskii dom, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 243–252.
20. Paducheva, E.V. (1996), Semanticheskie issledovaniya. Semantika vremeni i vida v russkom yazyke. Semantika narrativa [Semantic research. Semantics of time and aspect in the Russian language. Semantics of narrative], Yazyki russkoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.
21. Shmeleva, T.V. (1997), “Model of speech genre”, Genres of speech, iss. 1, Kolledzh, Saratov, Russia, pp. 88–98.
22. Uspenskii, B.A. (2011), “Deixis and secondary semiosis in the language”, Voprosy yazykoznaniya, no. 2, pp. 3–30.
23. Veselova, I.S. (2003), “Pragmatics of oral story”, in Belousov, A.F., Veselova, I.S. and Neklyudov, S.Yu., eds., Sovremennyi gorodskoi fol’klor [Contemporary urban folklore], Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia, pp. 234–244.
24. Veselova, I.S. (2023), “How to tell good stories and how to publish them well”, in Chervaneva, V.A., comp., Kommentarii kak sposob ponimaniya ustnogo teksta vnutri i vne fol’klornoi traditsii: materialy kruglogo stola (Moskva, RGGU, 20 aprelya 2023 g.) [Commentary as a way of understanding oral text inside and outside the folklore tradition: materials of the round table (Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities, April 20, 2023)], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 7–8.
Review
For citations:
Chervaneva V.A. Remarque in fairy tale and non-fairy tale text: the problem of speech genre. Folklore: Structure, Typology, Semiotics. 2024;7(2):10-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2024-7-2-10-25