Folklorists out of their element. Forum
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2020-3-2-15-48
Abstract
From the semiotic point of view, folklore tradition is transmitting culturally and socially significant messages via oral communication channels. Strong interrelation to dynamic interaction of people in vernacular contexts (as opposed to rigid institutional channels and static social structures) is one of folklore’s primary characteristics. With this perception of folklore tradition, folklore studies become a disciplinary area that accumulates unique research experience both on comprehension of transmitted messages and on methodological principles of working with texts and mechanisms of their transmission. This allows us to suggest that in research practice in neighboring fields two variants of transference of folklore studies’ theoretical resources may prove productive: according to presence of folklore elements in the studied material and according to general principles of working with texts (in the broad semiotic sense of the word).
The participants of the forum, all of them researchers with extensive experience in field work as well as in theoretical comprehension of oral tradition – were offered various problems for discussion. These problems included, but were not limited to, the boundaries of folklore studies’ object field, employing folklore studies’ methodological tools for analysis of other disciplinary fields’ objects, interaction of folklore studies with other academic disciplines, etc.
About the Authors
S. E. NikitinaRussian Federation
Serafima E. Nikitina, Dr. of Sci. (Philology)
bld. 1/1, Bolshoi Kislovsky lane, Moscow, 125009
N. V. Petrov
Russian Federation
Nikita V. Petrov, Cand. of Sci. (Philology)
bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993
bld. 82, Vernadskogo Av., Moscow, 119571
I. A. Razumova
Russian Federation
Irina A. Razumova, Dr. of Sci. (History)
bld. 40а, Akademgorodok, Apatity, Murmansk region, 184200
A. L. Toporkov
Russian Federation
Andrey L. Toporkov, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), professor, Соrresponding Member of RAS
bld. 25 a, Povarskaya Av., Moscow, 121069
L. L. Fialkova
Israel
Larisa L. Fialkova, Cand. of Sci. (Philology)
199 Aba Khoushy Ave, Mount Carmel, Haifa, 3498838
P. Janeček
Czech Republic
Petr Janeček, Ph.D., associate professor
bld. 2, Jan Palach Sq., Prague, 11638
Ü. Valk
Estonia
Ülo Valk, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), professor
bld. 16-210, Ülikooli Av., Tartu, 51003
References
1. Ban-Amos, D. (1998), “The name is the thing”, Journal of American Folklore, vol. 111, no. 441, pp. 257–280.
2. Bronner, S.H. (2017), Folklore: The basics, Routledge, London; New York, UK; NY.
3. Duranti, A. (ed.) (1999), Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, vol. 9, no. 1–2.
4. Feintuch, B. (ed.), (1995), “Common ground: Keywords for the study of expressive culture”, Journal of American Folklore, vol. 108, no. 430.
5. Johnston, S.I. (2018), The story of myth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. McNeill Lynne, S. (2013), Folklore rules: A fun, quick, and useful introduction to the field of academic folklore studies, Utah State University Press, Logan, UT.
7. Thompson, T. (2019), Posthuman folklore, University of Mississippi Press, Jackson, MS.
8. Thoms, W. (1999), “Folk-lore”, in Dundes A. (ed.), International folkloristics: Classic contributions by the founders of folklore, Rowman & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS INC., Lanham; Boulder; New York; Oxford, MD; CO; NY; UK, pp. 11–13.
Review
For citations:
Nikitina S.E., Petrov N.V., Razumova I.A., Toporkov A.L., Fialkova L.L., Janeček P., Valk U. Folklorists out of their element. Forum. Folklore: Structure, Typology, Semiotics. 2020;3(2):15-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2020-3-2-15-48