Preview

Folklore: Structure, Typology, Semiotics

Advanced search

Husbands asking for a memorial dinner, or the “Mythical lovers” motif. What do widows talk about after a war

https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2023-6-3-88-116

Abstract

On the example of analysis of oral folklore stories of the “Mythical Lover” plot circle, we show how the historical reality enters human experience, how it is reflected in the composition of narratives and how then they are remembered and retold, creating a special remembering group. The material is ten stories of different genres of oral folklore prose – mythological stories about sexual contacts with spirits, a story about evocation of forest spirit, stories about dreams, recorded by folklorists of St. Petersburg State University in the Vologda, Arkhangelsk, Kirov regions during the last 20 years from four women born in the 1930s. Not buried in accordance with the usual funeral ritual, those who died in the war do not leave the thoughts and feelings of their widows. The grief of military widows is doubly heavy. Meanings that were not articulated by the ritual emerge in the performance of storytelling. Collective storytelling (firstly, storytellers and empathetic listeners tell their stories for the first time at the moment of events; secondly, primary storytellers, their children and grandchildren have been repeating stories about the past for more than 80 years) restores vital tissue and carries such “orienting” concepts, as excessive pain, grief outside the ritual, unrelenting grief and the danger of “evil spirits” associated with them.

About the Author

I. S. Veselova
Saint Petersburg State University; non-profit organization “The Propp Centre for Humanities-based Research in the Sphere of Traditional Culture”
Russian Federation

Inna S. Veselova, Cand. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor

7–9–11, Universitetskaya Emb., Saint Petersburg, 199034

2, 1st Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034



References

1. Assman, A. (2023), Dlinnaya ten’ proshlogo: memorial’naya kul’tura i istoricheskaya politika [Long shadow of the past. Memorial culture and historical policy], Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, Moscow, Russia.

2. Assmann, J. and Czaplicka, J. (1995), “Collective memory and cultural identity”, New German critique: Cultural History/Cultural Studies, no. 65, pp. 125–133.

3. Chervaneva, V.A. (2019), “Deixis of oral mythological narratives. What are first person forms talking about?”, Shagi/Steps, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 36–52.

4. Etkind, A. (2018), Krivoye gore: pamyat’ o nepogrebennykh [Warped mourning. Stories of the undead in the land of the unburied], Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, Moscow, Russia.

5. Khal’bvaks, M. (2007), Sotsial’nyye ramki pamyati [The social frames of the memory], Novoye izdatel’stvo, Moscow, Russia.

6. Shyuts, A. (2008), “Some structures of the life world”, Voprosy sotsial’noi teorii, vol. 2, pp. 72–87.

7. Turner, V. (1987), “Social drama in Brazilian Umbanda. The dialectics of meaning”, in The anthropology of performance, PAJ Publications, New York, USA.

8. Vasilyuk, F.E. (1984), Psikhologiya perezhivaniya [Psychology of experience], Moscow University Press, Moscow, USSR.

9. Veselova, I.S. and Stepanov, A.V. (2019), “Experience by roles. Percipient, confident and others (communicative basis of the composition of mythological narratives in the Russian North)”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies” Series, no. 4, pp. 10–24.


Review

For citations:


Veselova I.S. Husbands asking for a memorial dinner, or the “Mythical lovers” motif. What do widows talk about after a war. Folklore: Structure, Typology, Semiotics. 2023;6(3):88-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2023-6-3-88-116

Views: 184


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-5294 (Print)