Sorcery, deception or harmless joke. Dialogue about magical practices in Court of Equity’s cases in the first half of the 19th century
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2023-6-1-10-73
Abstract
This article examines a detailed case involving an accusation of witchcraft against peasant Ivan Dulepov, which was heard before the Court of Equity in Nizhny Novgorod in 1812. In comparison with the materials from other Courts of Equity of the first half of the 19th century the one involving Dulepov provides a window onto how the court dealt with cases of using magical, primarily healer’s, practices. Comparative analysis shows that the adjudication in cases of witchcraft was related to the process of translation of peasant’s magical practices into the legal language by a judge and their correlation with the term “witchcraft” in the texts of the documents. The judicial term “witchcraft” included the use of spells that presuppose the accused’s belief in their efficacy and any harmful magical practices, but it excluded practices of healing with prayers and without using any texts (herbal medicine) and magic “for a joke”. The appearance in the course of the investigation of a case-specific bundle of meanings (for example, “witchcraft” and “sin”, “witchcraft” and “swindle”) concretised the nature of punishment (penance, corporal punishment or others). The article shows that the variability of this system of meanings is associated with the vagueness of the laws of the 18th – first half of the 19th centuries and the fluidity of the concept of “witchcraft” in traditional culture. The variability of court sentences in similar cases is also associated with the dialogic nature of testimony. Dialogical structure of the evidences is analyzed on the example of two interrogation points in the testimony of Ivan Dulepov (about the invocation of evil spirits and the belief in the “healing power” of spells) and it is shown how different ways of reading similar concepts by the accused and the judge affect the understanding of magical practices by different parts of the investigation.
About the Author
E. A. KuznetsovaRussian Federation
Ekaterina A. Kuznetsova - independent researcher.
Ekaterinburg
References
1. Abramzon, T.E. (1998), Superstitious notions and their interpretation in Russian literature of the second half of the 18th century, Abstract of a Ph.D. dissertation (Philology), Russian State Pedagogical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
2. Agapkina, T.A. (2010), Vostochnoslavyanskie lechebnye zagovory v sravnitel’nom osveshchenii: Syuzhetika i obraz mira [East Slavic healing spells in comparative coverage. Plot and image of the world], Indrik, Moscow, Russia.
3. Babkova, G.O. (2014), “ ‘Deception’, ‘superstition’, ‘ignorance’. Crimes against faith in the ‘Ustav blagochiniya’ of 1782 (to the question of sources)”, in O vere i sueveriyakh: sbornik statei v chest’ E.B. Smilyanskoi [On faith and superstition. A collection of articles in honour of E.B. Smilyanskaya], Indrik, Moscow, Russia, рр. 179–207.
4. Dixon, S. (2008), “Superstition in Imperial Russia”, in Smith, S.A. and Knight, A. (eds.), The religion of fools? Superstition past and present, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 207–228.
5. Efremova, I.S. (2019), “ ‘Witch hunt’ in the Kursk governorship in the 18th century (based on materials from the city magistrate and the Court of Equity)”, Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, vol. 49, no. 1, available at: http://scientificnotes.ru/#new-number?id=137 (Accessed 1 Jan 2021).
6. Frank, S. (1999), Crime, cultural conflict, and justice in rural Russia, 1856– 1914. University of California Press, Berkeley, СА, USA.
7. Ginzburg, C. (1989), “The inquisitor as anthropologist”, in Ginzburg, C., Clues, Myths and the historical method, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA, pp. 156–164.
8. Khristoforova, O.B. (2010), Kolduny i zhertvy: Antropologiya koldovstva v sovremennoi Rossii [Sorcerers and victims. Anthropology of witchcraft in modern Russia], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
9. Kivelson, V. (2013), Desperate magic. The moral economy of witchcraft in 17th-century Russia, Cornell University Press, London, UK.
10. Lavrov, A.S. (2000), Koldovstvo i religiya v Rossii: 1700–1740 gg. [Witchcraft and religion in Russia. 1700–1740], Drevlekhranilishche, Moscow, Russia.
11. Mel’nikova, E.A. (2006), “Scolding the possessed. Practices and discourses”, Antropologicheskii forum, vol. 4, pp. 220–263.
12. Mikhailova, T.V. (2006), “Magical practices. Crime and everyday life (based on the materials of ‘magical processes’ of the second half of the 18th century)”, in Kormina, J.V., Panchenko, A.A. and Shtyrkov, S.A. (eds.), Sny Bogoroditsy: issledovaniya po antropologii religii [Our Lady’s dreams. Studies in the anthropology of religion], EUSPb Press, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 32–52.
13. Mikhailova, T.V. (2018), From sorcerer to charlatan. Witchcraft processes in the Russian Empire of the 18th century (1740–1800), EUSPb Press, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
14. Moroz, A.B. (2000), “The concept of sin in the modern traditional culture of the Russian North”, in Belova, O.V. (ed.), Kontsept grekha v slavyanskoi i evreiskoi kul’turnoi traditsii [Concept of sin in the Slavic and Jewish cultural tradition], Probel, Moscow, Russia, pp. 195–206.
15. Panchenko, A.A. (2002), Khristovshchina i skopchestvo: fol’klor i traditsionnaya kul’tura russkikh misticheskikh sekt [Christianity and Hoarding. Folklore and traditional culture of Russian mystical sects], OGI, Moscow, Russia.
16. Pokrovskii, N.N. (1987), “Notebook of spells 1734”, in Moskalenko, A.T. (ed.), Nauchnyi ateizm, religiya i sovremennost’ [Scientific atheism, religion and modernity. A collection of articles], Nauka. Novosibirsk, USSR, pp. 239– 266.
17. Pokrovskii, N.N. (2005), Puteshestvie za redkimi knigami [Travelling for rare books], Sova, Novosibirsk, Russia.
18. Ramer, S.C. (1991), “Traditional healers and peasant culture in Russia, 1861– 1917”, in Peasant economy, culture, and politics of European Russia, 1800– 1921, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, pp. 207–232.
19. Rustemayer, A. (2012), “Criminal in the optics of the Enlightenment. The norm-making of the administrative elite regarding deviant behaviour in the Russian province of the 18th century”, in Dvoryanstvo, vlast’ i obshchestvo v provintsial’noi Rossii XViii veka [Nobility, power and society in provincial Russia of the 18th century], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, рр. 433–465.
20. Smilyanskaya, E.B. (2006), “About the concept of ‘superstition’ in Russia of the Age of Enlightenment”, in Kormina, J.V., Panchenko, A.A. and Shtyrkov, S.A. (eds.), Sny Bogoroditsy: issledovaniya po antropologii religii [Bogoroditsa’s dreams. Studies in the anthropology of religion], EUSPb Press, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 19–32.
21. Smilyanskaya, E.B. (2016), Volshebniki, bogokhul’niki, eretiki v setyakh rossiiskogo syska XViii veka [Sorcerers, blasphemers, heretics in the webs of the Russian investigation of the 18th century], Lomonosov, Moscow, Russia.
22. Starikova, N.V. (2013), “Court of equity in the judicial system of Catherine II (based on materials from the Nizhny Novgorod province)”, Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, vol. 4, available at: https://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/jour/article/view/432/408 (Accessed 1 Jan 2021).
23. Toporkov, A.L. (2005), Zagovory v russkoi rukopisnoi traditsii XV–XiX vv.: istoriya, simvolika, poetika [Spells in the Russian handwritten tradition of the 15th – 19th centuries. History, symbolism, poetics], Indrik, Moscow, Russia.
24. Voltmer, R. (2016), “The witch in the courtroom. Torture and the representations of emotion”, in Kounine, L. and Ostling, M. (eds.), Emotions in the history of witchcraft, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, pp. 97–116.
25. Worobec, C. (2001), Possessed. Women, witches, and demons in imperial Russia, Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb, IL, UK.
26. Worobec, C. (2013), “The 1850s prosecution of Gerasim Fedotov for witchcraft”, Russian History, vol. 40, no. 3–4, pp. 381–397.
27. Worobec, C. (2016), “Decriminalizing witchcraft in pre-emancipation Russia”, in Behringer, W., Lorenz, S. and Bauer, D.R. (eds.), Späte Hexenprozesse: Der Umgang der Aufklärung mit dem irrationalen, Verlag für Regionalgeschichte, Bielefeld, Germany, pp. 281–308.
28. Zhivov, V.M. (2002), Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoi kul’tury [Research in the field of history and prehistory of Russian culture], Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsova E.A. Sorcery, deception or harmless joke. Dialogue about magical practices in Court of Equity’s cases in the first half of the 19th century. Folklore: Structure, Typology, Semiotics. 2023;6(1):10-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2023-6-1-10-73