Clandestine intellectual games: gaming practices during the pandemic
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2022-5-2-109-121
Abstract
The research subject is the intellectual movement subculture “What? Where? When?” and “daughter” games – QUIZ, “60 seconds”, “Brain Slaughterhouse”, etc. during the coronavirus pandemic. Using the participant observation method, new players’ rituals, jokes, comic passwords and names of teams were collected, in which, as in the acts of verbal creativity of experts, it is possible to note the representation of the community’s attitude to the pandemic in three aspects: 1) features, symptoms and consequences of a new disease; 2) administrative measures aimed at limiting spread of the infection: self-isolation, QR-codes, event bans; 3) vaccinations against coronavirus, society attitude to them. A review of the collected material allows us to draw the following conclusions. Making fun of the public life phenomena associated with the pandemic is an effort to make them less scary and dangerous. The attitude to measures of limiting the spread of the infection (underground intellectual games held under conditions of mass event bans, readiness for other violations of restrictive measures) shows not only an attitude to the disease itself, but also distrust of the preventing coronavirus official policy.
About the Author
T. V. SavelyevaRussian Federation
Tatiana V. Savelyeva, Cand. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor,
bld. 1, Kerchenskaya St., Miass, 456313
References
1. Chistov, K.V. (2004), “Foreword”, in Shchepanskaya, T.B. Sistema: teksty i tradicii subkul’tury [System: texts and traditions of the subculture], OGI, Moscow, Russia.
2. Dolgih, D. and Kriushina, V. (2010), “Sovremennoe intellektual’noe dvizhenie: subkul’tura ili ‘obshhnost’ rassejannyh sobytii’?” [Contemporary intellectual movement: subculture or “scattered events community”?], available at: http://chgk43.ru/node/490 (Accessed 24 Nov. 2021).
3. Emer, A.Yu. (2011), “Folklore discourse: cognitive-discursive research”, Issues of cognitive linguistics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 50–60.
4. Golovanova, E.O. and Madzhaeva, S.I. (2020), “On the vocabulary of the coronavirus pandemic epoch”, Chelyabinsk State University Bulletin, vol. 441, no. 7, pp. 48–55.
5. Gromov, D.B. (2010), “Folklore of youth subcultures: patterns of formation and research problems”, in Dobrovolskaya, V.E. and Kargin, A.S. (comp.), Ot kongressa k kongressu: Navstrechu Vtoromu Vserossiiskomu kongressu fol’kloristov. Sbornik materialov [From Congress to Congress: Towards the Second All-Russian Congress of Folklorists. Compendium], State Republican Center of Russian Folklore, Moscow, Russia, pp. 134–150.
6. Gurevich, P.S. (1987), “The problem of subculture in modern foreign cultural studies”, in Kuchmaev, I.K. (ed.), Subkul’turnye ob”edineniya molodezhi: Kriticheskii analiz [Subcultural youth associations: a critical analysis], Moscow, Russia, pp. 24–31.
7. Kurilenko, E.N. (2009), “Game practices in the social reality of youth”, Scientific notes: the online academic journal of Kursk State University, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 156–161.
8. Losinskaya, A.Yu. (2012), “Forms of folklore in the role subculture”, Chelyabinsk State University Bulletin, vol. 276, no. 22, pp. 45–48.
9. Makgonigal, D. (2018), Real’nost’ pod voprosom. Pochemu igry delayut nas luchshe i kak oni mogut izmenit’ mir [Reality is in question. Why games make us better and how they can change the world], Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, Moscow, Russia.
10. Savel’eva, T.V. (2012), “Intellectual movement ‘What? Where? When?’: folklore and tradition”, Traditional culture, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 162–169.
11. Shchepanskaya, T.B. (2003), “Youth communities”, in Belousov, A.F., Veselova, I.S. and Neklyudov, S.Yu. (eds.), Sovremennyi gorodskoi fol’klor [Contemporary urban folklore], Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia, pp. 34–85.
12. Sutton-Smith, B. (1997), The ambiguity of play, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Review
For citations:
Savelyeva T.V. Clandestine intellectual games: gaming practices during the pandemic. Folklore: Structure, Typology, Semiotics. 2022;5(2):109-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2022-5-2-109-121