Preview

Folklore: Structure, Typology, Semiotics

Advanced search

V.M. Zhirmunsky as a folklorist. Origin and development of the comparative historical typology methods

https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2020-3-4-108-128

Abstract

The article considers the main stages in formation of the method for the comparative historical typology the first steps of which were made by A.N. Veselovsky in the second half of the 19th century. For example, the point elaborated upon in “Historical Poetics” concerning consequential evolution of genres and poetic forms that reflect social reality became the starting point for the further development of that method. Work in this direction was continued later on by V.M. Zhirmunsky. At the beginning of his career in academia he dwelled upon the issues of literary theory and - while keeping “Historical Poetics” in high regard - continued Veselovsky’s work in the field of literary studies. However, turning to folklore material, he managed to develop the basic principles of the comparative historical method: first of all, he had analysed and systematised the extensive epic material, what allowed him to reveal in the folklore work the national and the general, for the successful search and analysis of which the method was necessary. The author analysis of the works of Zhirmunsky, that contain his main ideas, and considers not only his suggestions on how to work with folk material, and also the features of the comparative typological method, as well as the development of Zhirmunsky’s ideas in the works of his students, followers and scientists who came to a similar result on their own (for example, V.Ya. Propp) and influenced further refinement of the methods of comparative typology.

About the Author

A. I. Kovalevskaya
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation


References

1. Азадовский М.К. История русской фольклористики. М.: Ин-т русской цивилизации, 2014. 1056 с.

2. Веселовский А.Н. Историческая поэтика. Л.: Художественная литература, 1940. 648 с.

3. Жирмунский В.М. Узбекский народный героический эпос. М.: Гослитиздат, 1947. 520 с.

4. Жирмунский В.М. К вопросу о народном творчестве // Ученые записки Ленинградского пединститута им. А.И. Герцена. Л., 1948. Вып. 67. С. 23-31.

5. Жирмунский В.М. Народный героический эпос: Сравнительно-исторические очерки. М.; Л.: Гос. изд-во худож. лит., 1962. 435 с.

6. Жирмунский В.М. Избранные труды: Тюркский героический эпос. Л.: Наука, 1974. 727 с.

7. Жирмунский В.М. Сравнительное литературоведение: Восток и Запад. Л.: Наука, 1979. 493 с.

8. Зеленин Д.К. Тотемы-деревья в сказаниях и обрядах европейских народов. М.; Л.: Изд-во Акад. наук СССР, 1937. 77 с.

9. Мелетинский Е.М. Сравнительная типология фольклора: историческая и структурная // Philologica: Исследования по языку и литературе: памяти академика В. М. Жирмунского / Под ред. Н.Н. Ярцевой. М.: Наука, 1973. С. 385-391.

10. Никифоров А.И. Чукотский сказочник и русская сказка. Этюд из истории чукотско-русской сказки // Памяти В.Г. Богораза (1865-1936): Сб. статей / Под ред. И.И. Мещанинова. М.; Л.: Издво Акад. наук СССР, 1937. С. 207-212.

11. Пропп В.Я. Морфология волшебной сказки. М.: Лабиринт, 2001. 192 с.

12. Путилов Б.Н. Методологические вопросы сравнительно-исторического изучения фольклора // Вестник Академии наук СССР. 1972. № 9. С. 55-59.

13. Путилов Б.Н. Методология сравнительно-исторического изучения фольклора. Л.: Наука, 1976. 244 с.


Review

For citations:


Kovalevskaya A.I. V.M. Zhirmunsky as a folklorist. Origin and development of the comparative historical typology methods. Folklore: Structure, Typology, Semiotics. 2020;3(4):108-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2020-3-4-108-128

Views: 476


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-5294 (Print)